Skip to main content

2017.11.06 Online Training


It happened in our online training on 6th Nov,2017.
It seemed to be a normal game contract to defender, however it was easy to fall into declarer's trap.


Board 13
Both Vul

      West    North    East    South     
                    1♢        3♠       Pass     
      Pass      3NT       AP                     
                                                           

      3NT   North

Trick     1     2     3     4
   1      ♠T   ♠7   ♠6   ♠J
   2      ♢9   ♢4   ♢Q  ♢3
        ♡Q   ?

East leads the ♠T and the declarer wins the ♠J in hand. Then declarer plays ♢9 to Dummy's ♢Q. After that, the declarer plays ♡Q from table quickly. How to play?

It seems that declarer holds ♡A. It is common knowledge that K should be played on the second trick to prevent partner's T from finesse on the next trick. Does common knowledge work well in this deal?

East plays ♢4 on the second trick, indicating that East holds odd cards in diamond. Obviously, East holds singleton. By analyzing the leading, declarer holds AQJ or KQJ or AKJ in spade. If declarer holds ♠AKJ, the contract is immortal. If declarer holds both ♡A and ♠KQJ, he will play spade on the second trick to knock out ♠A from West and hope that West holds ♡K as well as East doesn't play club when he wins on the second trick. So, declarer must hold ♠A through his play routine. If declarer holds ♡A, he will win 5♢, 2♡, 2♠ at least. In hence, ♡A in East is a necessary condition for defeating the contract. West should play ♡K immediately to protect partner's entry.

The full deal:
Board 13
Both Vul











Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NOTICE: Suspension of publication

Dear readers:     For some personal reasons, I am sorry that the blogger would not be updated for a long time, at least one month. Thank you for your understanding. Best Wishes!                                                                                                  X. Li                                                                                             2018.9.30                                    ...

Interactive Hand Testing

Fu Bo shared this deal with me. This deal happened in the open pair qualify of the 15th Would Bridge Series. She asked me could you find out the defense even if you saw 4 hands. Interactive hand analysis was interesting and played an important role in improving bridge technique. Although double-dummy analysis always stood on a God view, it was essential in a post-mortem analysis. This was first time to show a interactive hand analysis here. I'd appreciate if you could share any interesting double-dummy with me. How to defend 4♠? In this case, defenders should prevent declarer from ruffing ♣ or from winning 3♢. How to cut the connection between table and hand became a serious problem. Timing and speed were the crucial point. 1. Leading ♣     A slow step, losing an upper hand. Declarer could win with the ♣A and sent out small ♣. Even if the defender shift to trump, the declarer was a step ahead. (a) Returning small trump, won by North, ruffing a small ♣ and finessing ...

Asian Game_ Pairs Final: Creating an entry!

This deal happened in the last segment of Asian Game Pairs Finals. Who played this deal would never be mentioned in my blog. I was quite afraid of being accused of insulting players. Board 15 Dealer: South Vul: N-S South    West    North    East  2♡*        Pass     Pass        X  Pass       2♠       Pass      3NT   AP 2♡: Weak 6 cards ♡ Lead: ♣4 North followed ♣Q and you won with the ♣A. And now, how to play? Now you had 3♣, 1♡, so you need 4♠ and 1♢. You must assume that South hold ♢A and North hold ♠K. Otherwise it would down quickly. The leading was quite strange. If he was 1-6-3-3, he would lead ♢. If he was 2-6-2-3, ♡ was the normal leading. I felt South hold 4 cards ♣, because he led quickly. However, it was hard to say. Anyway, you need 2 entries to finesse ♠K. One was ♢K, appreciating the leading, ♣9 beca...