Skip to main content

The Devil's in the Detail!!!

This is the last deal in our weekly online training on 12th Mar, 2018.

Board 16
Vul: E-W
Dealer: West
North      East     South     West
                                              1♢
 Pass        2NT      AP

Lead: ♠6




Trick     North     East     South     West
   1         ♠Q         ♠K        ♠6           ♠2
   2         ♢5          ♢2        ♢4           ♢A
   3         ♢6          ♢3        ♠3           ♢K
   4         ♢Q         ♢8        ♡3           ♢9
   5           ?

Lead: ♠6

The declarer wins with the ♠K and runs two top ♢. You win with the ♢Q in the third round. Your partner discards ♠3 and ♡3. And now what's your plan?

The declarer could win 4♢, 2♠ and 2♡. ♠3 shows that your partner holds 5♠. Assuming that you return ♠ now, even if your partner holds ♠A, the declarer could return back twice easily to finesse ♡. In other words, discarding small ♡ and ♠ indicate that your partner doesn't hope you to return ♠. So shifting to ♣ is the only choice. To a player with certain experience, shifting to ♣ is obvious. And now the problem comes, which one to play? Will you play 5 casually? You just have 2 entry to through ♣. Assuming that you play ♣5, it does show that you hold 4♣ with top, unless the declarer holds both 3 and 4, you need 3 entries for follow-on defense. And it might encourage your partner to continue ♣, although after deep thought, your partner should not continue with ♣. You do dig a hole for your partner. For follow-on defense, ♣9 is a better choice. After winning, your partner will choose ♡ or ♠ according to his cards.

PS: If you return with ♣5, this deal becomes a playing problem. Here I will not go further on this issue.

The full deal:
Board 16
Vul: E-W
Dealer: West

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Premier League Final China 2018: Get professional! How a declarer became a defender

This deal happened in the last segment of The Premier League Final China 2018, PD Times VS Hengzhou. Board 8 Dealer: West Vul: None West     North     East     South Lorenzin J.Li        Bessis    Z.Fu Pass       Pass       Pass      1♣* Pass        1♢*       Pass      1NT Pass        2♡*         X          XX*  3♢          3♡*       Pass       4♠  AP 1♣: Precision 2♡, 3♡: Transfer Lead: ♡3 (3rd/5th) South won with the ♡A while you followed ♡J. Then the declarer crossed to the table with ♠J to lead a small ♡ from table. Now what's your plan? Who holds the ♡T and where is the ♢A become 2 serious questions. First, 3♢ indicates that West holds 4 ...

Saturday Training: Leading analysis

This deal happened in termly Saturday training. Card distribution analysis was always a commonplace in my blog. Now, it was still worth to be mentioned again. Board 3 Vul :N-S Dealer: South South     North  1NT         3♡*  3NT         AP 3♡: 4 cards ♠, choosing contract Lead: ♣7 (2nd/4th) West thought for a while and lead ♣7. East followed ♣J. It's your show time. Please start. It was ridiculous. Totally 27 points, only 6 tricks. Even if you get 4♠ and you create a winner in ♡, still 8 tricks. There was an easy way that finessing ♡K directly or hope 3-3 in ♣. How to find the best way to try all the chance became a serious problem. What comes first? For West, 3 cases, ♣97x, ♣7x or ♣97xx. Due to the period of his thinking and table sense, he hardly hold 4 cards ♣. In first two cases, why didn't he lead his 4 cards suit. That was to say, his longest suit was ♠. If he was 4-3-3-3, why didn't he le...

Online training: An unexpected but reasonable ducking

HAHAHA, after one month off bridge, I'm back!!! This deal happened in our weekly online training, Nov 5th, 2018. First of all, I have to admit my mistake. Hahaha, to be honest, the training was quite boring. After 12 boards, the scores were still 2:2. Although I knew X was not allowed and I would be fined if 3♣X was brought home, I still couldn't help to doing that. Board 13 Dealer: North Vul: Both North    East    South    West  Pass     Pass      1♢         2♢*   2♡*      2♠       Pass       Pass   3♣         X         AP 2♢: Michael 2♡: ♣ suit, better than 3♣ Lead: ♡3 (if hasn't raised, count has a priority. That is to say, xxx lead the smallest card) Table followed ♡9. Normally, you would play ♡Q causally. Would it be correct in this case? Leading analysis: Eas...