Skip to main content

Asian Game_ Supermixed Semi-Final_ Hongkong, China vs Chinese Taipei: A perfect contract with a terrible play

This deal happened in the first segment of Asia Games Semi-Finals, Hongkong, China vs Chinese Taipei.

Board 11
Dealer: South
Vul: None
                                                                                East         West
F. Wong   C. Koo
 1♠           1NT
 2♡           2NT
 3♡            4♠
 AP
Lead: ♣K
No one could know 4♡ or 4♠, which one is better before playing. Let's see some tricks in the open room first.

Trick    North     East     South     West
  1         ♣K          ♣5        ♣2          ♣6
  2         ♣3          ♣J         ♣A         ♠6
  3         ♠2          ♠3        ♠5          ♠J

And now how to play?
Analyzing the leading, North should be doubleton ♣ with K. That's a quite strange leading. Why don't he lead ♢. There's only one reason that he hold both minor suit K. If I were the declarer, I would continue to drawing the trumps. If ♠ was 1-4, only North could hold 4 cards ♠.
1. Assuming that South won with the next trump which showed ♠ was under normal distribution and South couldn't have any red suit K(otherwise he would open), whatever he returned, the contract was home as long as ♡ was under normal distribution.
(a) If he returned ♣, ruffing, then drawing all trumps, finesse ♡K through North or cross to table's ♡K and discard ♢Q on ♣Q are both ok.
(b) If he returned ♢, winning with the ♢A, drawing all trumps, cross to table's ♡K and discard ♢Q on ♣Q, then knock out ♡K and the last trump would be the entry to cash all the ♡.
2. Assuming that North won with the next trump and ♠ was 3-2, it was easier than situation 1. Do not discuss here.
3. The toughest situation was North hold 4 cards ♠. If he won with the ♠A on the next trick and shifted to ♡, I would cry South won with the ♡K and returned a ♣. If so, 4♡ would be one down, either. So it wasn't a bad news. So I could finesse breezily. If succeed, then drawing all the trumps and everything was fine.
All in all, drawing trumps is the best choice, North won, couldn't force or attack ♢, South won, showed ♠ was 3-2.

However, the live play is quite fun.
The full deal
Board 11
Dealer: South
Vul: None

Trick    North     East     South     West
  1         ♣K          ♣5        ♣2          ♣6
  2         ♣3          ♣J         ♣A         ♠6
  3         ♠2          ♠3        ♠5          ♠J
  4         ♡5          ♡J         ♡7          ♡3
  5         ♠8          ♠4        ♢5          ♠T
  6         ♡T          ♡A        ♡9          ♡2

On the fifth trick, the declarer gave a chance for North to avoid being thrown in. North won with the ♠A and returned ♠ which was blocked between table and hand. West couldn't draw all the trumps, couldn't cash ♣Q, she cashed ♡A and gave small ♡ out and now ♠9 was the free  cards for North to throw out. After a long period, North still ducked which led him to be thrown in the final-play. And now all cards were clear, just like double-dummy. Continuing to draw trumps, 11 IMPs would be written on Hongkong, China. Unfortunately, West didn't seize the opportunity. In another table, Chinese Taipei chose 4♡ as the contract. One down quickly by leading singleton ♠. It was lucky to Hongkong, China that a terrible play was saved by the opponent's wrong contract.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NOTICE: Suspension of publication

Dear readers:     For some personal reasons, I am sorry that the blogger would not be updated for a long time, at least one month. Thank you for your understanding. Best Wishes!                                                                                                  X. Li                                                                                             2018.9.30                                    ...

Interactive Hand Testing

Fu Bo shared this deal with me. This deal happened in the open pair qualify of the 15th Would Bridge Series. She asked me could you find out the defense even if you saw 4 hands. Interactive hand analysis was interesting and played an important role in improving bridge technique. Although double-dummy analysis always stood on a God view, it was essential in a post-mortem analysis. This was first time to show a interactive hand analysis here. I'd appreciate if you could share any interesting double-dummy with me. How to defend 4♠? In this case, defenders should prevent declarer from ruffing ♣ or from winning 3♢. How to cut the connection between table and hand became a serious problem. Timing and speed were the crucial point. 1. Leading ♣     A slow step, losing an upper hand. Declarer could win with the ♣A and sent out small ♣. Even if the defender shift to trump, the declarer was a step ahead. (a) Returning small trump, won by North, ruffing a small ♣ and finessing ...

Asian Game_ Pairs Final: Creating an entry!

This deal happened in the last segment of Asian Game Pairs Finals. Who played this deal would never be mentioned in my blog. I was quite afraid of being accused of insulting players. Board 15 Dealer: South Vul: N-S South    West    North    East  2♡*        Pass     Pass        X  Pass       2♠       Pass      3NT   AP 2♡: Weak 6 cards ♡ Lead: ♣4 North followed ♣Q and you won with the ♣A. And now, how to play? Now you had 3♣, 1♡, so you need 4♠ and 1♢. You must assume that South hold ♢A and North hold ♠K. Otherwise it would down quickly. The leading was quite strange. If he was 1-6-3-3, he would lead ♢. If he was 2-6-2-3, ♡ was the normal leading. I felt South hold 4 cards ♣, because he led quickly. However, it was hard to say. Anyway, you need 2 entries to finesse ♠K. One was ♢K, appreciating the leading, ♣9 beca...