BM2000 Questions in reality 2

This is a deal of bidding a bit higher due to the misunderstanding.

Board 4
Dealer: West
Vul: Both

West North East South
1♣ X Pass 2♣
X 2♡ Pass 2♠
Pass 3♠ Pass 4NT
Pass 5♣ Pass 5♠
Ap

Lead: ♠7

You win the ♠9 and East discards a small ♢. Now what's your plan?
It is similar to the question in BM2000. Assuming that West holds ♡A, ♢K and♣AQ. Crossing to the table with ♡K while West cannot win the ♡A. Drawing trumps to the hand and finesse ♢K, discarding ♡Q on the ♢A. Returning hand with ruffing small ♢. Then playing small from hand to J on the table. Everything is fine.

ATTENTION PLEASE:
If you don't have ♣J, this plan will fail if trump is 0-3. In this case, finesse ♡J might a better choice.

The full deal
Board 4
Dealer: West
Vul: Both

Comments

Online training: Please remember to detect the honors beforehand !!!

This deal happened in our weekly online training last Monday. I couldn't concentrate my attention due to the lack of card sense online. Rookie mistake should be mentioned here. Board 13 Vul: Both Dealer: North East West 1NT 2♣ 2♡ 4♡ Lead: ♠7 South led ♠7 while North followed ♠J. And I won with the ♠Q. Now what's your plan? ♠7 seemed to be doubleton. Firstly, you couldn't avoid to lose 1♠, 1♢ and 1♣ at least. In other word, you must make a right guess in who had ♡Q. For me, due to the leading, I had supposed South hold long ♡ and he hadn't led trump, so I just played casually, cashing ♡K, then ♡J->♡2->♡5->♡Q... Oops... Doing some detection first to find more clues might be a better choose. Sending out ♢ first and whatever who won, he had no choice but to return ♢ or ♠. I could win in hand. Crossing to table with ♣K. And now the distribution was clear. If one A for each, now it was your guess time, n...

Interactive Hand Testing

Fu Bo shared this deal with me. This deal happened in the open pair qualify of the 15th Would Bridge Series. She asked me could you find out the defense even if you saw 4 hands. Interactive hand analysis was interesting and played an important role in improving bridge technique. Although double-dummy analysis always stood on a God view, it was essential in a post-mortem analysis. This was first time to show a interactive hand analysis here. I'd appreciate if you could share any interesting double-dummy with me. How to defend 4♠? In this case, defenders should prevent declarer from ruffing ♣ or from winning 3♢. How to cut the connection between table and hand became a serious problem. Timing and speed were the crucial point. 1. Leading ♣ A slow step, losing an upper hand. Declarer could win with the ♣A and sent out small ♣. Even if the defender shift to trump, the declarer was a step ahead. (a) Returning small trump, won by North, ruffing a small ♣ and finessing ...

The Premier League Final China 2018: Get professional! How a declarer became a defender

This deal happened in the last segment of The Premier League Final China 2018, PD Times VS Hengzhou. Board 8 Dealer: West Vul: None West North East South Lorenzin J.Li Bessis Z.Fu Pass Pass Pass 1♣* Pass 1♢* Pass 1NT Pass 2♡* X XX* 3♢ 3♡* Pass 4♠ AP 1♣: Precision 2♡, 3♡: Transfer Lead: ♡3 (3rd/5th) South won with the ♡A while you followed ♡J. Then the declarer crossed to the table with ♠J to lead a small ♡ from table. Now what's your plan? Who holds the ♡T and where is the ♢A become 2 serious questions. First, 3♢ indicates that West holds 4 ...

My Small Bliss

Search This Blog