Skip to main content

Do not fall into the trap any more

This deal happened in the fifth segment of 17th World Youth Teams Championships Final, China Vs Poland.

Board 7
Dealer: South
Vul: All

North

KQJ874          
AKT5         
A63            
----
South    West    North    East
  X.Li                   B.Fu     Zofia
 Pass      Pass      1♠        1NT*
  X*        Pass        ?
1NT: Bal 15-17
X: Penalty

How to bid now?
It is quite strange. North hold 17 points, South could X and East could bid 1NT. Total points, at least 42!!!. Who is lying?
1. Pass
    If East hold 6 cards club with AKQ and ♠A, Fu will slap herself, I guess.
2. 2NT
    We didn't discussed what 2NT meant. I thought it was semi-solid suit with a bit slam trying.
3. 4♠
    Simple and crude.

Fu chose pass. She said to me that if Zofia hold 6 cards club with AKQ and ♠A, she would slap herself. She said "but my partner is you i really trust you if you hold ♢KQ and don't have ♠A. You wouldn't lead small ♠ like a robot. You would lead ♢K and we may win 9 tricks in red suits. That's why I chose pass to find out who was lying first. We've dropped into her trap in the qualifying and it was quite discreditable to be deceived twice. If Zofia ran away, then the situation would be clearer."
As expected, Zofia ran away. Now it became interesting.

South    West    North    East
  X.Li                   B.Fu     Zofia
 Pass      Pass      1♠        1NT*
  X*        Pass      Pass      2♣
 2♠        Pass         ?
It was obvious that Zofia didn't hold ♠A and she was lying. So Fu bid 4♣ and i cue bid 4♢ and she bid 6♠ directly.
South    West    North    East
  X.Li                   B.Fu     Zofia
 Pass      Pass      1♠        1NT*
  X*        Pass      Pass      2♣
 2♠        Pass       4♣        Pass
 4♢        Pass       6♠        AP
It is easier to reach 6♠ if Zofia bid 3♣ instead of 1NT. Unluckily, it doesn't work on us twice.

The full deal
Board 7
Dealer: South
Vul: All
It still remains some questions to be further discussed. What does 2NT mean after 1NT? Does it show that it is better than 2♠ like 4 cards ♠ support? Which one is better, X or 2NT? For Fu, pass or 2NT?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NOTICE: Suspension of publication

Dear readers:     For some personal reasons, I am sorry that the blogger would not be updated for a long time, at least one month. Thank you for your understanding. Best Wishes!                                                                                                  X. Li                                                                                             2018.9.30                                    ...

Online training: An unexpected but reasonable ducking

HAHAHA, after one month off bridge, I'm back!!! This deal happened in our weekly online training, Nov 5th, 2018. First of all, I have to admit my mistake. Hahaha, to be honest, the training was quite boring. After 12 boards, the scores were still 2:2. Although I knew X was not allowed and I would be fined if 3♣X was brought home, I still couldn't help to doing that. Board 13 Dealer: North Vul: Both North    East    South    West  Pass     Pass      1♢         2♢*   2♡*      2♠       Pass       Pass   3♣         X         AP 2♢: Michael 2♡: ♣ suit, better than 3♣ Lead: ♡3 (if hasn't raised, count has a priority. That is to say, xxx lead the smallest card) Table followed ♡9. Normally, you would play ♡Q causally. Would it be correct in this case? Leading analysis: Eas...

Interactive Hand Testing

Fu Bo shared this deal with me. This deal happened in the open pair qualify of the 15th Would Bridge Series. She asked me could you find out the defense even if you saw 4 hands. Interactive hand analysis was interesting and played an important role in improving bridge technique. Although double-dummy analysis always stood on a God view, it was essential in a post-mortem analysis. This was first time to show a interactive hand analysis here. I'd appreciate if you could share any interesting double-dummy with me. How to defend 4♠? In this case, defenders should prevent declarer from ruffing ♣ or from winning 3♢. How to cut the connection between table and hand became a serious problem. Timing and speed were the crucial point. 1. Leading ♣     A slow step, losing an upper hand. Declarer could win with the ♣A and sent out small ♣. Even if the defender shift to trump, the declarer was a step ahead. (a) Returning small trump, won by North, ruffing a small ♣ and finessing ...