Skip to main content

Finesse or Drop

This deal happened in the first segment of the 17th World Youth Teams Championships Final, China vs Poland.

Board 11
Dealer: South
Vul: None

Contract: 6♣
Declarer: South
Lead: ♣2





Trick    North    East    South    West
   1         ♣3        ♣6       ♣T          ♣2
   2         ♣7        ♡4       ♣K          ♣5
   3         ♣J         ♢4       ♣A         ♣9
   4         ♠T         ♠J       ♠2         ♠8
   5         ♢K         ♢6      ♢T          ♢J
   6         ♠K         ♠3      ♠4          ♠9
   7         ♠7         ♠5        ?

The contract looks easy making when you are taking a superficial look, however... After drawing trumps, l led a spade to dummy's ten and East's Jack. East returned ♢. Due to no 8 on table, so I have to play ten for an extra chance--QJ in East. Anyway the chance didn't appear. When I played dummy's King, I paused to take stock. West had followed suit with the ♠89, and now I had the extra option of finessing the missing ♠Q through East rather than playing for the drop, my original plan.

OS: Hahahaha, it's my show time!!!! Cannot miss such wonderful play!!! I will become the super star and the nice play will be published on bulletins if I succeed in finessing. 'FINESSE, FINESSE, FINESSE' the voice rings in my ear long. So... I gave up my original plan. And then so sad.... Down one, 14 IMPs to Poland... Indeed, it was published on bulletins, not nice play, Um....

The full deal
Board 11
Dealer: South
Vul: None


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NOTICE: Suspension of publication

Dear readers:     For some personal reasons, I am sorry that the blogger would not be updated for a long time, at least one month. Thank you for your understanding. Best Wishes!                                                                                                  X. Li                                                                                             2018.9.30                                    ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Online training: An unexpected but reasonable ducking

HAHAHA, after one month off bridge, I'm back!!! This deal happened in our weekly online training, Nov 5th, 2018. First of all, I have to admit my mistake. Hahaha, to be honest, the training was quite boring. After 12 boards, the scores were still 2:2. Although I knew X was not allowed and I would be fined if 3♣X was brought home, I still couldn't help to doing that. Board 13 Dealer: North Vul: Both North    East    South    West  Pass     Pass      1♢         2♢*   2♡*      2♠       Pass       Pass   3♣         X         AP 2♢: Michael 2♡: ♣ suit, better than 3♣ Lead: ♡3 (if hasn't raised, count has a priority. That is to say, xxx lead the smallest card) Table followed ♡9. Normally, you would play ♡Q causally. Would it be correct in this case? Leading analysis: Eas...
Post a Comment
Read more

Interactive Hand Testing

Fu Bo shared this deal with me. This deal happened in the open pair qualify of the 15th Would Bridge Series. She asked me could you find out the defense even if you saw 4 hands. Interactive hand analysis was interesting and played an important role in improving bridge technique. Although double-dummy analysis always stood on a God view, it was essential in a post-mortem analysis. This was first time to show a interactive hand analysis here. I'd appreciate if you could share any interesting double-dummy with me. How to defend 4♠? In this case, defenders should prevent declarer from ruffing ♣ or from winning 3♢. How to cut the connection between table and hand became a serious problem. Timing and speed were the crucial point. 1. Leading ♣     A slow step, losing an upper hand. Declarer could win with the ♣A and sent out small ♣. Even if the defender shift to trump, the declarer was a step ahead. (a) Returning small trump, won by North, ruffing a small ♣ and finessing ...
Post a Comment
Read more