Skip to main content

Xinrui Bridge: 3-3, Simple squeeze or Double squeeze?

This deal happened when I just open my eyes this morning. I hadn't imagined meeting such interesting deal in Xinrui ever before.

K86   K53   83   KJ643
AQ54   A64   AK62   A2

Contract: 6NT
Declarer: South
Lead: ♢Q

I won with the ♢A. And then cashing ♣A, trying to finesse ♣Q in West normally. Unfortunately, East won with the ♣Q and returned ♠J. And now how to play?

3♠, 2♡,  2♢, 4♣, totally 11 tricks where you must suppose ♣ was under a normal distribution. Where was the 12 tricks? Except ♠3-3, was there any chance? If you have read "Bridge Squeeze Complete", the format of type C1 might impress you. Assuming that West hold 5♢, then North had common threaten ♡3 and free suit honor ♣ while South hold both right(♢X) and left(♠X) threaten. The key to the success of type C1 double squeeze was that the honor of left threaten should be cashed before cashing frees suit honors. To satisfy this condition, you must win with the ♠Q and cash the ♢K and ♠A. And the cross to the table with ♠K. In this case, you have known whether ♠ was 3-3 or not. If you do that, the endplay would be like as following:
---   KXX --- X
X   AX   X   ---
it would be the typical type C1. Cashing the last ♣, East must remain 1♠ and 2♡, discarding ♠, West would be squeezed in red suits. This plan combined the chance of ♠3-3, simple squeeze(if West was 0-5-5-3) and a double squeeze.
If you remained the entry in ♠, that was the RFL double squeeze, a peculiar condition of type C1. Compared with the typical type C1, the difference was the location of the entry, left threaten suit replace the common suit. That was to say, the endplay was as follows:
X   KX   ---   X
AX   X   X   ---
Obviously, this play gave up the chance of ♠3-3.

What's more, if North hold ♡KTX, that would be interesting. Even if East hold 3♢, squeeze still exist as long as East hold ♡Q or ♡J. He must remain 1♠, 1♢ and ♡Q, so that West's ♡J would be caught. I couldn't remember the name of this type.

The full deal
In this deal, you would know the distribution clearly on the forth trick. Even if East try to cut your entry on the forth trick by returning ♡, you still don't need to suppose ♠3-3 or playing a double squeeze while East hold 4♠, shifting ♡ rather than ♠J may cause a guess for the declarer.


Anyway, I played casually this morning because I never thought such an interesting deal would appear. Winning with ♠K directly, just hoping a simple squeeze at last. I regretted at once when I followed a small ♠ casually.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NOTICE: Suspension of publication

Dear readers:     For some personal reasons, I am sorry that the blogger would not be updated for a long time, at least one month. Thank you for your understanding. Best Wishes!                                                                                                  X. Li                                                                                             2018.9.30                                    ...

Online training: An unexpected but reasonable ducking

HAHAHA, after one month off bridge, I'm back!!! This deal happened in our weekly online training, Nov 5th, 2018. First of all, I have to admit my mistake. Hahaha, to be honest, the training was quite boring. After 12 boards, the scores were still 2:2. Although I knew X was not allowed and I would be fined if 3♣X was brought home, I still couldn't help to doing that. Board 13 Dealer: North Vul: Both North    East    South    West  Pass     Pass      1♢         2♢*   2♡*      2♠       Pass       Pass   3♣         X         AP 2♢: Michael 2♡: ♣ suit, better than 3♣ Lead: ♡3 (if hasn't raised, count has a priority. That is to say, xxx lead the smallest card) Table followed ♡9. Normally, you would play ♡Q causally. Would it be correct in this case? Leading analysis: Eas...

Interactive Hand Testing

Fu Bo shared this deal with me. This deal happened in the open pair qualify of the 15th Would Bridge Series. She asked me could you find out the defense even if you saw 4 hands. Interactive hand analysis was interesting and played an important role in improving bridge technique. Although double-dummy analysis always stood on a God view, it was essential in a post-mortem analysis. This was first time to show a interactive hand analysis here. I'd appreciate if you could share any interesting double-dummy with me. How to defend 4♠? In this case, defenders should prevent declarer from ruffing ♣ or from winning 3♢. How to cut the connection between table and hand became a serious problem. Timing and speed were the crucial point. 1. Leading ♣     A slow step, losing an upper hand. Declarer could win with the ♣A and sent out small ♣. Even if the defender shift to trump, the declarer was a step ahead. (a) Returning small trump, won by North, ruffing a small ♣ and finessing ...