Skip to main content

Online training: An unexpected but reasonable ducking

HAHAHA, after one month off bridge, I'm back!!!

This deal happened in our weekly online training, Nov 5th, 2018.

First of all, I have to admit my mistake. Hahaha, to be honest, the training was quite boring. After 12 boards, the scores were still 2:2. Although I knew X was not allowed and I would be fined if 3♣X was brought home, I still couldn't help to doing that.

Board 13
Dealer: North
Vul: Both
North    East    South    West
 Pass     Pass      1♢         2♢*
  2♡*      2♠       Pass       Pass
  3♣         X         AP
2♢: Michael
2♡: ♣ suit, better than 3♣

Lead: ♡3 (if hasn't raised, count has a priority. That is to say, xxx lead the smallest card)
Table followed ♡9. Normally, you would play ♡Q causally. Would it be correct in this case?

Leading analysis: East seems to hold 3♡, unless East hold ♡32. In that case, North might not scramble for 3♣ under such vulnerability if North has 4 cards ♡.
Bidding analysis: There is no doubt that East doubled, depending on good trump. North scramble for the 3♣ which indicates that he hold at least 6 cards ♣ ,singleton ♠ and ♢A. Namely, ruffing ♢ was impossible. So winning 5 tricks in ♡ and ♣ was the only defense. East must hold two ♣ honors and some structures.
Structure analysis:
(1) ♣ suit
What  ♣ East becomes a serious problem.
(a) KQ9X Maybe he would not double.
(b) AQ9X At least he hold. Even better, such as AQ98 or KQ98
(2) ♡ suit
Does East hold ♡J? If North hold ♡J, there is no need for him to ruff the last ♡. That is to say, winning the first trick was meaningless. If East hold ♡J, playing Q and T is equivalent.
(3) Combination
Winning with ♡Q equals to give up the chance of trump promotion because ♡ is the only connection between you and your pn. So following ♡T seems to be crazy but reasonable.

Some readers may ask ducking would lead over one. Thinking deeply, South hold ♣T, if he ruff the last ♡, your pn would win 3♣ which has the same value in total tricks. In other words, if East hold ♣KQ9X without ♡J, the contract was icy. So you must assume that your pn must hold ♣KQ9X and ♡J at least and follow ♡T breezily.

The full deal
Board 13
Dealer: North
Vul: Both
Unluckily, being fined 1000 rmb was the end of the story.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NOTICE: Suspension of publication

Dear readers:     For some personal reasons, I am sorry that the blogger would not be updated for a long time, at least one month. Thank you for your understanding. Best Wishes!                                                                                                  X. Li                                                                                             2018.9.30                                    ...

Interactive Hand Testing

Fu Bo shared this deal with me. This deal happened in the open pair qualify of the 15th Would Bridge Series. She asked me could you find out the defense even if you saw 4 hands. Interactive hand analysis was interesting and played an important role in improving bridge technique. Although double-dummy analysis always stood on a God view, it was essential in a post-mortem analysis. This was first time to show a interactive hand analysis here. I'd appreciate if you could share any interesting double-dummy with me. How to defend 4♠? In this case, defenders should prevent declarer from ruffing ♣ or from winning 3♢. How to cut the connection between table and hand became a serious problem. Timing and speed were the crucial point. 1. Leading ♣     A slow step, losing an upper hand. Declarer could win with the ♣A and sent out small ♣. Even if the defender shift to trump, the declarer was a step ahead. (a) Returning small trump, won by North, ruffing a small ♣ and finessing ...