Skip to main content

Calculate carefully beta2.0

This is another defense problem in our weekly online training on 5th Feb, 2018.

Board 3
Vul: E-W
Dealer: South
    North     East     South     West
                                 1♠          X
     2♠           3♣       4♠         AP

Lead: ♢A

Trick     North     East     South     West
   1         ♢3           ♢2        ♢8       ♢A
   2                                                   ?

You lead ♢A and your partner follows ♢2. How to defend? Would you continue to play ♢ or play a small ♣ what your partner has bidden or draw a trump as a negative defense?

You have to consider several questions as followings:
Q1: Where are the 4 winners?
Q2: Who will hold singleton ♢, your partner or the declarer?
Q3: If the declarer holds 3♢, will losers be discard at once?
Q4: Is it necessary to play through ♣ immediately? Could the loser in ♣ be discard?

Your partner bids 3♣, indicating that barely will he hold 4♡, otherwise he may bid X instead of 3♣. It is obvious that the loser in ♣ couldn't be discard at once and the declarer holds long heart. So it is unnecessary to play through ♣ now. So continuing to play ♢ or playing ♡ becomes the main question. If your partner holds singleton ♢ and the declarer holds singleton ♣A, the distribution of the declarer will be 5♠, 4♡, 3♢ and 1♣, where is the entry to dummy to discard the loser in ♢. Your partner will not bid 3♣ in such vulnerability if he holds 3 small ♠ and 6 cards ♣ with QJ only. All in all, even if the declarer holds 3♢, the losers in ♢ always exist. If the declarer holds singleton ♢ and 5 small hearts, a ruff in ♡ is the only way to defeat the contract. Even if the declarer holds ♡A, you could still play through ♣ or draw ♢ by winning with the ♡K. Playing ♡ in the second trick is an unexpected but reasonable coup after carefully calculating.

The full deal:
Board 3
Vul: E-W
Dealer: South









Fu said that East should X at last, which would greatly reduce the difficulty of defense.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Premier League Final China 2018: Get professional! How a declarer became a defender

This deal happened in the last segment of The Premier League Final China 2018, PD Times VS Hengzhou. Board 8 Dealer: West Vul: None West     North     East     South Lorenzin J.Li        Bessis    Z.Fu Pass       Pass       Pass      1♣* Pass        1♢*       Pass      1NT Pass        2♡*         X          XX*  3♢          3♡*       Pass       4♠  AP 1♣: Precision 2♡, 3♡: Transfer Lead: ♡3 (3rd/5th) South won with the ♡A while you followed ♡J. Then the declarer crossed to the table with ♠J to lead a small ♡ from table. Now what's your plan? Who holds the ♡T and where is the ♢A become 2 serious questions. First, 3♢ indicates that West holds 4 ...

Online training: Please remember to detect the honors beforehand !!!

This deal happened in our weekly online training last Monday. I couldn't concentrate my attention due to the lack of card sense online. Rookie mistake should be mentioned here. Board 13 Vul: Both Dealer: North East    West 1NT      2♣  2♡       4♡ Lead: ♠7 South led ♠7 while North followed ♠J. And I won with the ♠Q. Now what's your plan? ♠7 seemed to be doubleton. Firstly, you couldn't avoid to lose 1♠, 1♢ and 1♣ at least. In other word, you must make a right guess in who had ♡Q. For me, due to the leading, I had supposed South hold long ♡ and he hadn't led trump, so I just played casually, cashing ♡K, then ♡J->♡2->♡5->♡Q... Oops... Doing some detection first to find more clues might be a better choose. Sending out ♢ first and whatever who won, he had no choice but to return ♢ or ♠. I could win in hand. Crossing to table with ♣K. And now the distribution was clear. If one A for each, now it was your guess time, n...

BM2000 Questions in reality 3

It seems to be an impossible deal, however there is a little hope by the leading. Board 1 Dealer: North Vul: None  North    South    1♣          1♠    2♠          2NT*        2NT: Asking    3♢*        3♡*           3♢: 5♣    3♠*        3NT          3♡: Asking    4♣          4♢            3♠: No singleton    4♡          4NT    5♡          6♠    AP Lead: ♡4 I  never thought my partner only hold 4♣. That's why I asked key cards and reached an impossible contract. The leading gave me a little bit hope because I might win with ♡J in the first round. As long as ♣ was 3-3 or West hold 4♣, the contract became...