Skip to main content

An Entry Killing Play or Not

This deal happened in our weekly online training on 12th Mar, 2018.

Board 13
Vul: Both
Dealer: North
North     East     South     West
  1♢        Pass       3♣*        Pass
 3NT      Pass       Pass       Pass

3♣: Inv
Lead: ♠4



Trick     North  East  South  West
  1           ♠K      ♠4      ♠2       ♠J
  2           ♣2      ♣6      ♣J        ♣K
  3                                             ?

North accepts the invitation from South. The declarer wins with the ♠K and play a small club to dummy's ♣J. You win with the ♣K. And now what's your plan? 

Obviously, South bids a bit more. 1NT might be a normal bidding, because ♣ is not strong enough to bear the risk of 3NT in such a vulnerability.

Fourth highest leading is applied in our defense. ♠4 indicates that partner holds 4♠ only. Returning ♠ is hopeless. To defeat the contract, partner must hold 10 points at least. Assuming that the declarer holds 16 points, the contract is frigid. Returning ♡ seems to be an entry killing coup. If the declarer couldn't return back hand, he will lose 3♣ and more importantly, there is no enough entry for dummy to build the ♣ suit and run it. Analyzing deeply, shifting ♡ will succeed in only one situation that the declarer holds 3 hearts with K and ♢A without ♠A. If the declarer doesn't hold ♡K, he must hold ♢AK. He could easily return back and he will win 5♣, 2♡, 2♢ and 1♠ at least. So your partner must hold one top ♢. You will win 2♣ and no hope in ♡, so ♢ is the only resource for other 2 winners. Hence, shifting ♢ is inevitable. Even if in above-mentioned situation, shifting ♢ is still a good choice. Assuming that the distribution of declarer is 4-3-4-2 with ♡K and ♢A, your partner will hold 4-3-3-3 with ♢K. If you shift ♢, the declarer must duck in this trick, otherwise he will lose 2♣, 2♢ and 1♠. In this situation, after winning with the ♢K, your partner will calculate the distribution of the declarer through his cards and he will decide to shift ♡ to kill the dummy's entry or keep returning ♢. 

The full deal:
Board 13
Vul: Both
Dealer: North

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Premier League Final China 2018: Get professional! How a declarer became a defender

This deal happened in the last segment of The Premier League Final China 2018, PD Times VS Hengzhou. Board 8 Dealer: West Vul: None West     North     East     South Lorenzin J.Li        Bessis    Z.Fu Pass       Pass       Pass      1♣* Pass        1♢*       Pass      1NT Pass        2♡*         X          XX*  3♢          3♡*       Pass       4♠  AP 1♣: Precision 2♡, 3♡: Transfer Lead: ♡3 (3rd/5th) South won with the ♡A while you followed ♡J. Then the declarer crossed to the table with ♠J to lead a small ♡ from table. Now what's your plan? Who holds the ♡T and where is the ♢A become 2 serious questions. First, 3♢ indicates that West holds 4 ...

Online training: Please remember to detect the honors beforehand !!!

This deal happened in our weekly online training last Monday. I couldn't concentrate my attention due to the lack of card sense online. Rookie mistake should be mentioned here. Board 13 Vul: Both Dealer: North East    West 1NT      2♣  2♡       4♡ Lead: ♠7 South led ♠7 while North followed ♠J. And I won with the ♠Q. Now what's your plan? ♠7 seemed to be doubleton. Firstly, you couldn't avoid to lose 1♠, 1♢ and 1♣ at least. In other word, you must make a right guess in who had ♡Q. For me, due to the leading, I had supposed South hold long ♡ and he hadn't led trump, so I just played casually, cashing ♡K, then ♡J->♡2->♡5->♡Q... Oops... Doing some detection first to find more clues might be a better choose. Sending out ♢ first and whatever who won, he had no choice but to return ♢ or ♠. I could win in hand. Crossing to table with ♣K. And now the distribution was clear. If one A for each, now it was your guess time, n...

BM2000 Questions in reality 3

It seems to be an impossible deal, however there is a little hope by the leading. Board 1 Dealer: North Vul: None  North    South    1♣          1♠    2♠          2NT*        2NT: Asking    3♢*        3♡*           3♢: 5♣    3♠*        3NT          3♡: Asking    4♣          4♢            3♠: No singleton    4♡          4NT    5♡          6♠    AP Lead: ♡4 I  never thought my partner only hold 4♣. That's why I asked key cards and reached an impossible contract. The leading gave me a little bit hope because I might win with ♡J in the first round. As long as ♣ was 3-3 or West hold 4♣, the contract became...