Skip to main content

A Deceptive Second Hand High?

This is an interesting deal that I have met in the 2018 National Youth Bridge Championship.

Board 11
Vul: None
Dealer: South
        South     West     North     East 
         1♠         Pass       Pass      1NT*
        Pass        2♣*        Pass       2♢*
        Pass       3NT         AP

       1NT: Balancing, 12-15p
         2♣: Stayman
         2♢: No major suit

Lead: ♠J
Trick     1     2     3     4
   1      ♠J    ♠6   ♠5  ♠Q
   2      ♣4   ♣7   ♣9  ♣2
   3      ♡2     ?

East wins with the ♠Q and plays a small club to dummy's ♣9. When you are marveling at the declarer's play, declarer plays ♡2 from dummy quickly. How to defend? It seems to be an unilateral defense by your partner, none of your business. Will you follow a small card casually?

As we all know, "Second Hand Low, Third Hand High" is always normal in defensive playing. However, bridge is always full of exceptions. Sometimes 'Second Hand High' may make great trouble for the declarer.

Analyzing the bidding and play routine, we could easily know that the declarer holds 3♠, 3♡, 3♢ and 4♣. If the declarer holds 5♣, instead of playing ♡ in the next trick, he will continue to play ♣ to establish long suit. If the declarer holds 2♠, he must hold 4♢, in such case, he may bid double rather than 1NT and more importantly, he would play ♢ replacing ♡. Through play routine, the declarer seems to hold ♡AJX. "Playing ♡Q to invite the declarer to think you hold ♡KQ" is a classic deceptive play example in textbook. Does it work in this deal? Obviously, no!!! From declarer's point of view, South holds at least 12 points, dummy holds 11 points, so North holds at most 4 points. Even if you follow ♡Q, you hold ♡KQ is a quite small probability event. It is hard for an experienced declarer to guess wrong. So, if the declarer holds ♡AJX, he will win 2♠, 3♡, 1♢, 3♣, 9 tricks. Is there any chance to defeat the contract? Definitely, yes!!!
If the declarer holds ♡J only, he could win 3♠, 2♢ and 3♣. So he must drive out ♡AKQ and the ninth trick comes from ♡. What you should do is to play ♡Q at once. It is the coup to protect your partner's entry.

It seems like to let the declarer guess wrong by Second Hand High, in fact the declarer will be impossible to make wrong decision, but actually it is the only defense to defeat the contract. Maybe many players will do the correct decision instinctively on the table. However it is not the most important matter. Knowing why it is done is more meaningful than playing correctly in the long term. In this situation, 'Second Hand High' is not a deceptive defense, but a coup to protect partner's entry, just like the example in 2017.11.06 online training. LINK: http://xinyi-littleworld.blogspot.com/2017/11/20171106-online-training.html

Actually, I was the unlucky declarer holding ♡TXX. In the meanwhile, North hold ♡QJX. No one would follow a small heart. So the contract went down in a second.
How I wish I could hold ♡J. Things always get the opposite of what I want. Whatever North holds, QXX or QTX, he should play Q.

The Full Deal:
Board 11
Vul: None
Dealer: South

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Online training: An unexpected but reasonable ducking

HAHAHA, after one month off bridge, I'm back!!! This deal happened in our weekly online training, Nov 5th, 2018. First of all, I have to admit my mistake. Hahaha, to be honest, the training was quite boring. After 12 boards, the scores were still 2:2. Although I knew X was not allowed and I would be fined if 3♣X was brought home, I still couldn't help to doing that. Board 13 Dealer: North Vul: Both North    East    South    West  Pass     Pass      1♢         2♢*   2♡*      2♠       Pass       Pass   3♣         X         AP 2♢: Michael 2♡: ♣ suit, better than 3♣ Lead: ♡3 (if hasn't raised, count has a priority. That is to say, xxx lead the smallest card) Table followed ♡9. Normally, you would play ♡Q causally. Would it be correct in this case? Leading analysis: East seems to hold 3♡, unless East hold ♡32. In that case, North might not scramble for 3♣ under such vulnerability if North has 4 cards ♡. Bidding analysis: There is no doubt that East doubled,

Asian Game_ Pairs Final: Creating an entry!

This deal happened in the last segment of Asian Game Pairs Finals. Who played this deal would never be mentioned in my blog. I was quite afraid of being accused of insulting players. Board 15 Dealer: South Vul: N-S South    West    North    East  2♡*        Pass     Pass        X  Pass       2♠       Pass      3NT   AP 2♡: Weak 6 cards ♡ Lead: ♣4 North followed ♣Q and you won with the ♣A. And now, how to play? Now you had 3♣, 1♡, so you need 4♠ and 1♢. You must assume that South hold ♢A and North hold ♠K. Otherwise it would down quickly. The leading was quite strange. If he was 1-6-3-3, he would lead ♢. If he was 2-6-2-3, ♡ was the normal leading. I felt South hold 4 cards ♣, because he led quickly. However, it was hard to say. Anyway, you need 2 entries to finesse ♠K. One was ♢K, appreciating the leading, ♣9 became another entry. Before everything, you must knock out ♣J first. 1. If South won with the J and returned ♣. The distribution was clear. And South must hold d

Online training: Please remember to detect the honors beforehand !!!

This deal happened in our weekly online training last Monday. I couldn't concentrate my attention due to the lack of card sense online. Rookie mistake should be mentioned here. Board 13 Vul: Both Dealer: North East    West 1NT      2♣  2♡       4♡ Lead: ♠7 South led ♠7 while North followed ♠J. And I won with the ♠Q. Now what's your plan? ♠7 seemed to be doubleton. Firstly, you couldn't avoid to lose 1♠, 1♢ and 1♣ at least. In other word, you must make a right guess in who had ♡Q. For me, due to the leading, I had supposed South hold long ♡ and he hadn't led trump, so I just played casually, cashing ♡K, then ♡J->♡2->♡5->♡Q... Oops... Doing some detection first to find more clues might be a better choose. Sending out ♢ first and whatever who won, he had no choice but to return ♢ or ♠. I could win in hand. Crossing to table with ♣K. And now the distribution was clear. If one A for each, now it was your guess time, no more information I thought. May